 |
| Find dockets from Federal trial courts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Election 2008
Will There Be A Hollywood Ending To The Dramatic Story Of Clinton Vs. Obama?
by JOHN W. DEAN
Presidential Candidates vs. Hate
Why Obama And McCain Should Repudiate The Messages Of Their Extremist Religious Endorsers
by MARCI HAMILTON
|
|
|
| Real-Time SEC Edgar Filings |
| Enter all or part of the company's name or ticker symbol. You can also search for companies grouped by Standard Industrial Classification codes: |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| US Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit |
|
- MARLYN NUTRACEUTICAL v. MUCOS PHARMA GMBH [07/02]
Civil Procedure, Contracts, Drugs & Biotech, Intellectual Property, Trademark
In a trademark infringement action involving the enzyme-based dietary supplement Wobenzym, the District Court's preliminary injunction requiring Defendant to cease selling a dietary supplement is affirmed in part, where Defendant did not meet its burden to prove that Plaintiff ceased production of the supplement; but vacated in part, where a District Court must find a substantial risk of danger to the public or other special circumstances in order to enter an interlocutory order recalling a product in a trademark infringement case. - BIBLE v. SCHRIRO [07/01]
Criminal Law & Procedure, Habeas Corpus, Sentencing
In a capital habeas matter, the denial of Petitioner's petition is affirmed, where Petitioner was not prejudiced by any of his counsel's alleged errors during the sentencing phase of his trial, because there was no reasonable probability that the sentencing judge would have reached a different result in the absence of the alleged errors. - CHAPMAN v. PIER 1 IMPORTS [06/29]
Civil Rights, Health Law, Retail
In an Americans with Disabilities Act action alleging failure to provide restroom accommodations in Defendant's store, summary judgment for Defendant is affirmed where Plaintiff did not have standing to challenge barriers he did not personally encounter.
|
|
*PDF Format |
|
|
|
|
|
